The crisis experienced
due to the pandemic created by COVID-19 has developed the urgent need to expand the
horizons of bioethics, to bring it to the reflection and solution of problems that
concern all human beings and that are intrinsically connected with each other. others.
Today more than
ever it is necessary to think about human relations and the environment we inhabit,
attending to particular and local circumstances from a global horizon, methodology, principles and
proposals. Today the problems are no longer individual; now they are collective and shared, on a
global scale, persistent over time, and require great collective efforts to mitigate and eradicate
them. Thus giving the slogans with which global bioethics arises.
In the first
article, Henk ten Have, presents his article COVID-19 and global bioethics, where he
proposes three approaches to respond to the pandemic: a) exceptionality, b) controllability, and
c) the binary approach. With what helps to recover the relationship between people, as well as
solidarity, which are the fundamental principles to recover the dignity and protect the health of
human beings.
In the second
article by Cristina de la Cruz "Bioethics and global justice. Critical analysis of the
global COVID-19 vaccination strategy", the author considers the ethical problem of
the criteria for the distribution of vaccines from global justice. Discussing thus, proposals for
a fair distribution of vaccines, under the assumption that all countries should have the right to
access them, since health is a common good and an international human right.
In the third
article of this issue, "Global bioethics: new arguments about animal rights?", by
Gómez Álvarez, allows a renewed discussion around the old problem about
whether or not animals have rights and, after analyzing the existing bibliography, discovers that
the arguments used are almost always the same, with the exception of some that are novel.
In the fourth
article "Bioethical implications in the contagion effect of suicide", by Érika
Benítez, she looks at a painful reality that has become more acute in this time
of pandemic, which is suicide. The perspective from which the author addresses this problem is
from the role and responsibility of the media in the "contagion effect" of suicide.
The article by
Pasquale Gallo and Joseph Tham, "Comparison of NaProTechnology with Assisted Reproduction
Techniques" where they present an interesting approach to NaProTechnology in
comparison with current assisted reproduction techniques.
The last article
in this issue, "Self-assessment of knowledge and application of the code of conduct by
public health servants in Tlaxcala", Óscar Castañeda and Rosalba Jaramillo
make an interesting analysis of adherence to the codes of conduct of public servants in a
hospital in Tlaxcala, with the aim of verifying that, the greater adherence to the code, the
higher level of user satisfaction and better quality in the services provided.
Finally, this
issue presents a review:
The review that
is presented is about the book "Bioethics" by Guerrero Martínez, where
he offers a novel literature in the field of bioethics, since it analyzes topics
that are not limited to the field of clinical bioethics, but that range from the use from
biotechnologies to the debate on animal rights and, also, insofar as they are
approached and reflected upon from the philosophical point of view of great thinkers, such as
Kierkegaard, Gadamer, Derrida and Nussbaum.
From Editorial number 1,
Vol. 33.
|